http://www.711chan.org/i Live RSS feed for http://www.711chan.org/i en'; http://www.711chan.org/i/res/1421.html#1425 >>1422

Sure, spamming twitter with odd hash tags is a tad boring, but how is this moral BEEKEEPING?

]]> http://www.711chan.org/i/res/1421.html#1424 >>1423
requesting that you suck OP's anal juice out of his hairy asshole

]]> http://www.711chan.org/i/res/1421.html#1423 Get the fuck out BEEKEEPER.

]]> http://www.711chan.org/i/res/1421.html#1422 BEEKEEPING to spam twitter with #gorillaOCTOFUCKERPOTATOCANNON hashtags. nevermind. just go to 8.8.8.c.h.a.n if you want to participate anyway.

]]> http://www.711chan.org/i/res/1421.html

Sunday, 5th of July 2009, at 3 pm Central. That is 9 pm for Britfags, 10 pm for the rest of Eurofags

http://anonym.to/http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23gorillaOCTOFUCKERPOTATOCANNON

http://anonym.to/http://partyvan.info/wiki/Operation_Shitter

]]> http://www.711chan.org/i/res/180.html#1420
I can only deliver like 20gbps SYN on my own..

]]> http://www.711chan.org/i/res/374.html#610 >>374
I loled.
>>463
I loled again
>>388
This shouldn't be a rule, just a rule of THUMB. There may arise a situation where a *chan may need to be taken down as a form of containment. unlikely, but as /i/nsurgents, we should be prepared for retardation at the Japanese level.

]]> http://www.711chan.org/i/res/180.html#591 >>587
You do know this method is one of the easiest to block, regardless of the web server used, right?

]]> http://www.711chan.org/i/res/180.html#587 >>478
Term was used comparatively to IIS.

>>531
My point was that there are a lot more IIS exploits floating around than apache exploits, this tool makes taking down apache about as easy as taking down IIS, varying methods do apply, of course.

IMHO IIS and Apache are both shit.

]]> http://www.711chan.org/i/res/374.html#557 >>535

close enough

]]> http://www.711chan.org/i/res/374.html#535 >>465
anontalk's not a chan, bro.

]]> http://www.711chan.org/i/res/180.html#531 >>453

Actually, this method doesn't work on IIS, shitty as it is.

]]> http://www.711chan.org/i/res/180.html#478 >>453
>apache
>solid software

You have never *really* used apache have you?

]]> http://www.711chan.org/i/res/180.html#466 >>459

So your saying this tool can take down a country's internet on a 56k modem?

Makes sense seeing as your computer doesn't really need to use the half open connections.

I guess the internet is just poorly configured, or you're a troll.

]]> http://www.711chan.org/i/res/374.html#465 >>457

About as bad or worse than anontalk.

Also, >>463 can die in a fire and get b&, its against the rules to complain about partying hard.

]]>